How PropVision scores a project
Every score on this site is computed by one published formula from data we hold on file. This page is that formula. Last updated 12 September 2026.
The five measures
Each is scored 0–10, then combined with these weights:
| Measure | Weight | What it asks |
|---|---|---|
| Price vs locality | 30% | Is it fairly priced against its own micro-market? |
| Legal & approvals | 25% | Are the statutory approvals actually in hand? |
| Livability | 20% | Green cover, noise, convenience, metro distance |
| Space efficiency | 15% | What you receive for the area you pay for |
| Delivery confidence | 10% | How much construction risk is already retired |
Price vs locality (30%)
The project's average rate against the locality benchmark. Cheap is not automatically good — a deep discount usually signals a problem — so the curve peaks at fair value rather than at the bottom.
| Premium over locality average | Score |
|---|---|
| 25% or more below | 5.0 |
| 10–25% below | 9.0 |
| Within 5% of the average | 10.0 |
| 5–15% above | 8.0 |
| 15–30% above | 6.0 |
| 30–50% above | 4.0 |
| More than 50% above | 2.0 |
Legal & approvals (25%)
The share of statutory approvals we hold a status for that are actually cleared, across ten types: khata, development plan, building plan, water NOC, pollution board NOC, height NOC, fire NOC, legal opinion, development rights and city development plan.
Scored only over approvals we have a status for. A project missing fire-NOC data is not the same as a project whose fire NOC was refused, and is not scored as if it were. Fewer than four known approvals and this measure is dropped entirely.
Livability (20%)
The mean of whichever of these we hold: green cover, a convenience score, a composite noise score (inverted — quieter scores higher), and distance to the nearest metro station — under 1 km scores 10, 1–3 km 8.5, 3–5 km 7.0, 5–10 km 5.0, beyond that 3.0.
Space efficiency (15%)
The mean of whichever we hold: carpet-to-saleable efficiency (75%+ scores 10, under 55% scores 3), units per acre (30 or fewer scores 10, over 150 scores 1.5) and open area percentage (70%+ scores 10, under 30% scores 4).
Delivery confidence (10%)
Sale status (ready to move 10, under construction 6.5, pre-launch 4.0), how far out possession is (this year 10, falling to 4.0 beyond three years), and the project's Google rating where one exists.
Missing data is never counted as a bad score
If we hold no data for a measure, that measure is excluded and the remaining weights are rebalanced across what is left. A project with no livability data is not given a zero — it is scored on the other four and the result is stated as being out of however many measures applied.
If the measures we can score account for less than 60% of the total weight, no score is published for that project at all. A rating nobody can stand behind is worse than no rating.
Where the data comes from
| Measure | Source |
|---|---|
| Price | Project and locality rates in the PropVision property database |
| Legal | Approval documents on file, most linked directly on the project page |
| Livability | Air-quality, noise and distance measurements per project location |
| Space | Configuration-level carpet and saleable areas as published by the builder |
| Delivery | Filed possession dates, sale status, and Google ratings |
What the score does not tell you
It does not account for construction quality, the builder's delivery history on past projects, litigation, or title. It is computed from what is on file, and what is on file is not everything that matters. Treat it as one input, read the page it sits on, and verify the RERA record before any payment.